Filter and Sort







PSYC2025HASSEL10783 PSYC

Sector Diversity in Trust Based Relationship Intervention Practitioners

Type: Undergraduate
Author(s): Paige Hassel Psychology Carla Ayala Psychology Erin Razuri Psychology
Advisor(s): Carla Ayala Psychology Erin Razuri Psychology
Location: Third Floor, Table 2, Position 2, 1:45-3:45

Sector diversity in professional training programs is a crucial factor in expanding the reach and effectiveness of trauma-informed interventions across multiple disciplines. This exploratory study examines the year-to-year expansion of sector diversity in Trust-Based Relational Intervention (TBRI) Practitioner Training from 2019 to 2024. Data from 4,048 participants across six years of training sessions were analyzed to assess trends in sector representation across 16 professional categories. Annual participant counts ranged from 498 in 2020 to 1,229 in 2024. Findings indicate a gradual diversification of professional representation, with juvenile justice, sex trafficking, corrections, international outreach, and medical professional sectors remaining underrepresented. These insights highlight areas requiring targeted outreach to enhance the inclusion of diverse professional backgrounds in future training cohorts. The study contributes to understanding trends in professional diversity within TBRI training and informs future recruitment strategies for underrepresented sectors.

View Presentation

PSYC2025HAYES53127 PSYC

Under Pressure: How Frustration Disrupts Ethical Decision-Making

Type: Undergraduate
Author(s): Paris Hayes Psychology Will Komar Psychology Adelaide Lovett Psychology Amanda Ochranek Psychology Hailey Stewart Psychology
Advisor(s): Timothy Barth Psychology Kevin Diegel Psychology
Location: Basement, Table 6, Position 1, 11:30-1:30

Ethical decision-making is affected by both cognitive and emotional factors; nevertheless, little research has been directed towards the impact of frustration in moral reasoning. We examined the impact of frustration in decision-making in response to both classical (Sacrificial) and real-world (Contemporary) moral dilemmas in two different studies (N = 328). The participants first took the Ethical Perspectives Scale (Diegel et al., 2024) and were then assigned to a frustrating anagram completion or control group. Next, they responded to ethical dilemmas and gave us data about personality traits, religious orientation, socioeconomic status, sex, age, and political orientation.
The results showed that frustration significantly reduced the ability of ethical perspectives to predict decision-making. Without frustration, Utilitarianism was a strong predictor of outcome-oriented decisions (p ≤ .01), while Rights and Common Good ethics were linked to deontological decision-making (p ≤ .01). However, under the influence of frustration, these effects disappeared (p ≥ .05), suggesting that emotional upset undermines moral consistency. Frustration also undermined the influence of Virtue and Care ethics (p ≤ .01), particularly under high-stakes conditions.
Later tests revealed correlations between ethical positions and personality traits. Both Care ethics and Virtue ethics showed significant relationships with higher religiosity levels (p ≤ .05), while Rights ethics was negatively related with religiosity (p ≤ .01). Politically, Virtue ethics was linked with conservative orientations, while Care ethics was linked with liberal orientations (p ≤ .05). Tests for personality factors showed Utilitarianism associated with low Openness (p = .002), while Virtue ethics was predictive of higher Openness (p = .043).
The findings highlight how frustration undermines moral reasoning, thus disrupting ethical frameworks in the decision-making process. This carries important implications for leadership, policy-making, and crisis situations where ethical decisions have to be made under high-stress conditions.

View Presentation

PSYC2025HERNANDEZ45960 PSYC

Testing with Feedback Enhances Caregiver Knowledge of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia

Type: Undergraduate
Author(s): Maryann Hernandez Psychology Sophia Lohrmann Psychology Morgan Shumaker Psychology
Advisor(s): Uma Tauber Psychology
Location: SecondFloor, Table 3, Position 1, 11:30-1:30

Many people living with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD) are cared for by informal caregivers (Thompson et al. 2007). Caregivers can face challenges managing and treating symptoms owing to gaps in their dementia-related knowledge (Jorge et al., 2021). Prior work has found that practice testing enhances long-term retention of information (Agarwal et al., 2021). Practice testing followed by elaborative feedback also benefits learning, regardless of whether the retrieval attempt is successful or unsuccessful (Butler, 2008; Roediger & Butler, 2011). We examined whether practice testing with or without elaborative feedback improved caregivers’ learning of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Caregivers studied 12 categories of BPSD and then either restudied the material, took a practice test with no feedback, or took a practice test with elaborative feedback. We found that testing with feedback enhanced caregivers’ learning of BPSD more than testing with no feedback or restudying on both an immediate and delayed test. We also present characteristics of our sample.

View Presentation

PSYC2025HERRERA48678 PSYC

Testing a Women and PrEP Education Tool

Type: Undergraduate
Author(s): Esmeralda Herrera Psychology Casey Chesterman Interdisciplinary Breton Estes Biology Vera Farah Biology Sarah Gonzalez Interdisciplinary Savannah Hastings Psychology Ewaoluwa Olabisi Biology Morayma Rodriguez Psychology
Advisor(s): Amanda Weise Psychology
Location: Basement, Table 2, Position 3, 1:45-3:45

Awareness and uptake of HIV-preventative medications in women remain low, which contributes to a high prevalence of cases in the southern United States. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an available and effective HIV prevention medication. However, it is not very well-known, particularly among women. This study aims to increase awareness and knowledge of PrEP through an educational model, which includes a pre-survey and a post-survey to assess changes in the participants’ understanding of the medication. Women were recruited through SONA, Mturk, and in-person recruitment methods, with a goal of N = 50 - 150. Data from the surveys about the women’s attitudes and knowledge of PrEP before and after the educational model will be analyzed using a paired samples t-test. We hypothesize that after viewing the PrEP & Women education module, participants’ knowledge and attitudes towards PrEP will change significantly. Specifically, we predict that after viewing the module, individuals’ PrEP attitudes will become more positive and their PrEP knowledge will increase. Overall, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of a PrEP education tool that can be utilized on a wider scale to increase PrEP knowledge and decrease negative attitudes/stigma.

View Presentation

PSYC2025HERRERA49774 PSYC

Task Experience Improves Younger and Older Adults’ Ability to Memorize Important Medication Information

Type: Undergraduate
Author(s): Esmeralda Herrera Psychology Emily Anderson Psychology Jordan Edwards Psychology Morgan Shumaker Psychology
Advisor(s): Uma Tauber Psychology
Location: Basement, Table 9, Position 2, 11:30-1:30

Learning and remembering medications requires forming memory associations that older adults (65+ years old) tend to experience difficulty forming (e.g., Naveh-Benjamin, 2000). One way older adults can compensate for such memory deficits is to prioritize remembering more important information over less important information. With task experience, older adults can prioritize remembering important information as well as younger adults (e.g., Castel, McGillivray, & Friedman, 2012; McGillivray & Castel, 2017). We examined how much task experience is needed for older and younger adults to learn drug interactions and their side effects. Participants studied fictitious drug interactions with side effects that differed in severity (mild, moderate, severe) and took a cued recall test across three trials. Participants also completed measures of health knowledge and side effect knowledge to evaluate self-efficacy. Recall improved with task experience in both younger and older adults, and both age groups remembered severe side effects over mild and moderate side effects, which is consistent with prior work (e.g., Friedman et al., 2015). Younger adults remembered more than older adults, which provides insights to the cognitive differences between older and younger adults in their abilities to recall health information. Older adults scored higher than younger adults on the health knowledge measure, but there was no difference in side effect knowledge between age groups.

View Presentation